Week Ten: Asking the Questions that Matter
At this point in the semester, you have written and revised at least
four papers. You are also, in all likelihood, somewhere near the beginning
of at least four years in college writing papers. Where should you be
right now? How can you assess your own progress?
We would like to suggest that, at this point in the semester, you should
have a pretty good idea whether or not you are generating passing work:
you should be producing writing that dependably engages with the assigned
readings, that takes a position, and that is well organized. How do you
get your writing up to the higher levels, though? It's one thing to produce
passing work-that, at least, insures that you'll fulfill your writing
requirement-but what about getting beyond passing?
For this tutorial, we'd like you to ask the same question of your writing
that we do when we read it: what difference does it make if the argument
that is being made is true? Or, to put the question more succinctly, so
what? You're writing will begin to improve considerably when your essays
begin to include clear answers to these questions. There are probably
slightly friendlier ways to ask these questions, but we think it best
not to mislead you at this point about how best to assess your own progress.
To begin the process of assessing your progress, we'd like you to identify
the position you are arguing for in your current draft. Then we'd like
you to apply the questions we suggest below to your position statement.
Let's say that you've written an essay that draws on Tenner, Siebert, and Davis to argue that:
"An over-dependence on technology has a negative impact
on the relationship between humans and the environment."
This sounds significant-it sounds like it matters, but how do you tell
whether making such a statement is a notable achievement or not? To assess
the significance of your own position, we invite you to ask the following
questions:
|
Question type
|
Questions to ask
|
Questions applied to sample position statement
|
|
WHAT?
|
What do the important phrases in your position statement mean?
|
What constitutes an "over-dependence on technology"?
What is a "negative impact"?
What is "the relationship" between humans and the environment?
|
|
WHY?
|
Why does the relationship you focus on exist?
|
Why has the relationship between humans and the environment been
altered?
What is it about this relationship that led humans to establish
a relationship with technology?
|
|
HOW?
|
How is the relationship you focus on produced?
|
How, specifically, does the over-dependence on technology produce
a "negative impact" on the relationship between humans
and the environment?
|
|
SO WHAT?
|
What is the significance of the relationship you focus on?
Why does it matter?
What follows from having established the existence of this relationship?
|
Why should it matter that humans are now "over-dependent"
on technology?
What can be done to alter this situation?
|
Once you've subjected your position statement to this line of questioning,
you're bound to find ways that both the statement and your essay can be
improved.
To return to our sample position statement, we can see that it doesn't
stand up well to this initial round of questioning: while the claim does
appear to establish a basic cause/effect relationship, it only allows
a reader to agree ("Yes, there is a negative impact") or disagree
("No, there is not a negative impact"). What this position needs
to establish is why it matters that there is an "over-dependence"
on technology and what follows from acknowledging that relationship.
Below is a revised version of the sample position based on responses
to the WHY, WHAT, HOW, and SO WHAT questions:
The function of technology is to help humans increase their
chances of surviving (WHY). Ideally, technology also improves
the quality of human life. But, recent developments in cancer research and the changing behavior of animals toward humans show that technology
also has the power to imperil human survival and to reduce the quality
of human life (HOW). It seems that humans are no longer in control
of the tools they originally created to harness nature's powers, and
this loss of control is producing negative consequences for both the
human community and the environment (WHAT). While this loss of control
is producing a wide range of problems, the one I wish to focus on
here is the sense of powerlessness and despair that are created once
of sees technology as it charge of human destiny (SO WHAT).
As you can see, the revised position is more detailed. It provides an
explicit explanation of context that has given rise to the writer's project
and it concludes with an explicit statement of why considering this issue
matters: it is this writer's contention that the rising importance of
technology has produced a sense of "powerlessness and despair"
in the human community. In the paragraphs that follow, it would be reasonable
to expect the writer to explain just how this sense of powerlessness and
despair is produced, offering evidence from the readings, and detailing
its significance.
How will you know when your writing has improved? Does your position
matter? Can you show how and why others should care about the argument
that you've made? When you can show in your writing why your own position-what
the consequences of holding your position are-then you will be well on
the way to mastering the form of the academic essay.
|